EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF ELBERT R. ROBINSON, PETITIONER

Citator

Cited By

• Watts v. Unione Austriaca di Navigazione C., 248 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1918)
  …rfered with, since no abuse was shown. 229 Fed. Rep. 136. On June 12, 1916, an application for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Court of Appeals to review. the [*21] exercise of discretion by the District Court was denied (241 U. S. 655), and a writ of certiorari was granted by this court. 241 U. S. 677. The certiorari and return were filed July 21, 1916. On December 7, 1917, the President issued a proclamation declaring that a state of war exists between the United States and Aust…
• Horn v. Mitchell, 243 U.S. 247 (U.S. 1917)
  …apable of being valued in money, and therefore excludes habeas corpus cases. Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487, 498; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 88; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 135; Healy v. Backus, 241 U. S. 655. Appellant seeks to sustain his appeal under §§ 763 and 764 of the Revised Statutes. 1 They gave a right of [*250] appeal fropa the District Court to the Circuit Court in two classes of habeas corpus cases, and an appeal from the Circuit Court to t…