THE BRONX NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER,
v.
MARCUS ROSENTHAL, TRUSTEE, ETC.
THE BRONX NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER,
MARCUS ROSENTHAL, TRUSTEE, ETC.
241 U.S. 672
Supreme Court of the United States (1916)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kirkman v. Farmers' Sav. Bank of Boyden, 28 F.2d 857 (8th Cir. 1928)…on of facts, the question whether the facts are sufficient to support the judgment is open ti> review on writ of error, though neither a finding nor declaration of law are requested. Hipple v. Bates County, 323 F. 22 (C. C. A. 8), certiorari, denied 241 U. S. 672, 36 S. Ct. 723, 60 L. Ed. 1231; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 U. S. 71, 73, 13 S. Ct. 481, 37 L. Ed. 373; Wayne County v. Kennicott, 103 U. S. 554, 26 L. Ed. 486; Blair v. United States (C. C. A.) 241 F. 217, 230; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Kelly, 114 F. 268…