WATTS, WATTS & COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
UNIONE AUSTRIACA DE NAVIGAZIONE, ETC.
WATTS, WATTS & COMPANY, PETITIONER,
UNIONE AUSTRIACA DE NAVIGAZIONE, ETC.
241 U.S. 677
Supreme Court of the United States (1916)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Watts v. Unione Austriaca di Navigazione C., 248 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1918)…, 1916, an application for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Court of Appeals to review. the [*21] exercise of discretion by the District Court was denied (241 U. S. 655), and a writ of certiorari was granted by this court. 241 U. S. 677. The certiorari and return were filed July 21, 1916. On December 7, 1917, the President issued a proclamation declaring that a state of war exists between the United States and Austria-Hungary. The case was argued here on April 17, 1918. This court…
-
Capitol Transp. Co. v. Cambria Steel Co., 249 U.S. 334 (U.S. 1919)…. The Benjamin Noble. A writ of certiorari was granted before Luckenbach v. McCahan Sugar Refining Co., 248 U. S. 139, and Pendleton v. Benner Line, 246 U. S. 353, were decided but when they were before this Court. 245 U. S. 648. See 242 U. S. 638. 241 U. S. 677. The findings of fact are contested here, and because of some expressions it is suggested that the Circuit Court of Appeals is to be taken not to have made findings of its own upon the facts. On the contrary it appears to us to have reconsidered the…