CYNTHIA LINDSAY, PETITIONER,

v.

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Bowles v. Zimmer Mfg. Co., 277 F.2d 868 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …21 Ind.App. 175, 98 N.E. 2d 245; Louisville & N. R. R. v. Revlett, 224 Ind. 313, 65 N.E. 2d 731. See Waynick v. Chicago’s Last Department Store, 7 Cir., 269 F. 2d 322, 335; Lindsay v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 7 Cir., 226 F. 23, 26, certiorari denied 241 U.S. 678, 36 S.Ct. 727, 60 L.Ed. 1233; Anderson v. Linton, 7 Cir., 178 F. 2d 304, 308; Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. Wadsworth, 6 Cir., 113 F. 2d 827, 829; 76 C.J.S. Release § 39, p. 671. In Jewell v. Welch, 117 Mich. 65, 75 N.W. 283, at page 284, the court said;…
• Union Indem. Co. v. Home Tr. Co., 64 F.2d 906 (8th Cir. 1933)
  …Sun Printing & Pub. Ass’n v. Moore, 183 U. S. 642, 650, 22 S. Ct. 240, 46 L. Ed. 366; Jenson v. Toltec Ranch Co. (C. C. A. 8) 174 F. 86, 89; Badders Clothing Co. v. Burnham-Munger-Root Dry Goods Co. (C. C. A. 8) 228 F. 470, 474 (certiorari denied 241 U. S. 678, 36 S. Ct. 727, 60 L. Ed. 1233); Manchester Mill & Elev. Co. v. Strong (C. C. A. 8) 231 F. 876, 881; Ratcliff v. Clendenin (C. C. A. 8) 232 F. 61, 67; El Dorado Refining Co. v. Lientz (C. C. A. 8) 7 F.(2d) 814, 817; Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Ec…