ALDER

v.

EDENBORN

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• SUN First Nat'l Bank OF Melbourne ad litem of the Est. of Ralph E. Balch & Bess D. Balch v. Lael N. Batchelor, 308 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …ary, Third Revision, page 749, defines damage to personal property, inter alia, as the unlawful taking and detention thereof from the owner. Numerous cases have held that conversion is an “injury to property.” In McIntyre v. Kavanaugh, 242 U.S. 138, 37 S.Ct. 38, 61 L. Ed. 205, the Supreme Court of the United States had occasion to determine whether the plaintiff’s cause of action for conversion of stock certificates survived the defendant’s discharge in bankruptcy. The federal statute involved in that case…
• Weaver v. Marcus, 165 F.2d 862 (4th Cir. 1948)
  …erally accepted doctrine at common law is that the liability of the partners in tort would be joint and several and not joint. James—Dickenson Farm Mortgage Co. v. Harry, 273 U.S. 119, 47 S.Ct. 308, 71 L.Ed. 569; McIntyre v. Kavanaugh, 242 U.S. 138, 37 S.Ct. 38, 61 L.Ed. 205; Armstrong v. New La Paz Gold Mining Co., 9 Cir., 107 F. 2d 453; Lindley on Partnership, 10th Ed., 356; Mechem, Elements of Partnership, §§ 312, 338; 40 American Jurisprudence 261. Though the language of the Uniform Partnership Act is…
• In re Cecchini v. Cecchini, 780 F.2d 1440 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …willful and malicious injury within the meaning of the exception.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 11523.15[1] at 523-120 (15th ed. 1983) (citations omitted). This formulation accords with the Supreme Court’s holding in McIntyre v. Kavanaugh, 242 U.S. 138, 37 S.Ct. 38, 61 L.Ed. 205 (1916), affirming a lower court’s determination that debts from conversion are willful and malicious and therefore nondischargeable. In so holding, the Court rejected the requirement that malice toward the individ-. ual need be shown,…