ETHORN BUIE, PETITIONER,
v.
L. D. JOHNSON & SONS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
ETHORN BUIE, PETITIONER,
L. D. JOHNSON & SONS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
168 So. 2d 541
Florida Supreme Court (1964)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 80 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 29, 1964
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (39 total)
-
Heiney v. State, 447 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1984)…an that for which the accused is on trial is also relevant to an issue of material fact. If so, then the evidence is admissible even though it points to the commission of a separate crime. Ashley v. State, 265 So. 2d 685 (Fla.1972); State v. Norris, 168 So. 2d 541 (Fla.1964); Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). The judicial concern referred to above, however, is that the collateral crime evidence will serve only to show criminal propensity o…
-
McLEAN v. State, 934 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 2006)…d by undue prejudice.”). Before allowing Williams rule evidence to be presented to the jury, the trial court must find that the State has proved that the defendant committed the collateral acts by clear and convincing evidence. See State v. Norris, 168 So. 2d 541, 543 (Fla.1964) (concluding that the district court’s requirement that proof of the connection between the defendant and the collateral act be by clear and convincing evidence did not conflict with Williams); Henrion v. State, 895 So. 2d 1213, 1216…
-
Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2002)…h v. State, 700 So. 2d 446, 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Audano v. State, 641 So. 2d 1356, 1359-60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Malcolm v. State, 415 So. 2d 891, 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Chapman v. State, 417 So. 2d 1028, 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); State v. Norris, 168 So. 2d 541, 543 (Fla.1964). . See Chandlery, State, 702 So. 2d 186, 194 n. 6 (Fla.1997); Heuring v. State, 513 So. 2d 122, 124 (Fla.1987). . See Duffey v. State, 741 So. 2d 1192, 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ("Under section 90.404(2)(a), the remoteness of a prio…
Previewing 3 of 39 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence