CHARLES SCHWEINLER PRESS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
CHARLES SCHWEINLER PRESS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
242 U.S. 618
Supreme Court of the United States (1916)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185; Louisiana Navigation Company v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99; Thompson v. St. Louis, 241 U. S. 637. Mr. Alfred E. Ommen for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Bobert S. Johnstone and Mr. Leonard J. Oberman for the defendant in error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- La. Navigation Co. v. Oyster Comm'n of La., 226 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1912)
- Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U.S. 173 (U.S. 1905)
- Haseltine v. Cent. Bank OF Springfield, 183 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1901)
- Mo. & Kan. Interurban Ry. Co. v. City of Olathe, 222 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1911)
- Coates v. The Dist. of Columbia, 239 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1916)
- Thompson v. The City of St. Louis, 239 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1916)