THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
DAVID BRANSON

U.S. | 1917-01-29
No. 631
242 U.S. 623 Supreme Court of the United States (1917) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Winters, ante, 353. Mr. George A. Pearre, Mr. Duncan K. Brent and Mr. A. Taylor Smith for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Albert A. Doub, Mr. F. Brooke Whiting and Mr. George Lewis Eppler for the defendant in error.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Urie v. Thompson, 337 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1949)
    …ct for injuries not caused by accidental or violent means. These include Shelton v. Thomson, 148 F. 2d 1; 157 F. 2d 709, where recovery was permitted for carbon monoxide poisoning; B. & O. R. Co. v. Branson, 128 Md. 678, reversed on other grounds,- 242 U. S. 623, in which recovery was allowed for paint poisoning. Cf: C. R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Cheek, 105 Okla. 91. Not all of these decisions could be sustained if the statutory term “injury” were held, to require that , the harm suffered from the employer’s n…
  • Erie R.R. Co. v. Szary, 253 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1920)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw