ALFRED D. BIELEY, APPELLANT,
v.
A. WORLEY BROWN, WALTER L. LIGHTSEY AND STIRLING TURNER, AS MEMBERS OF AND CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, AND LEONARD P. CARDONE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A lawyer sought to enjoin a Deputy Industrial Commissioner from hearing any cases in which the lawyer represented claimants. The trial court dismissed the suit, and the appellate court affirmed, holding that disqualification of administrative hearing officers must proceed under statutory procedures for judicial disqualification, not by separate chancery action, and that blanket disqualifications are impermissible under Florida law.
The court held that the proper method for seeking disqualification of an administrative hearing officer is through the statutory procedures applicable to circuit judges under Florida law, not through a separate chancery suit; additionally, a blanket disqualification from "any cases" is improper under Florida law. If a Deputy Industrial Commissioner refuses to recuse himself, review should be sought before the full Commission and the Florida Supreme Court.
“the correct method for seeking the disqualification of an administrative hearing officer is in accordance with the procedures available by statute for seeking the disqualification of a circuit judge, to wit: § 38.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.”
Establishes that disqualification of administrative officers must follow judicial disqualification procedures, not separate chancery actions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBieley, a practicing lawyer, filed a chancery suit to enjoin Deputy Industrial Commissioner Leonard P. Cardone from hearing any further cases in which…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Legislative Intent cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant, a practicing lawyer, instituted a chancery suit seeking to enjoin the appellee, Leonard P. Cardone [as a Deputy Industrial Commissioner], from hearing any further cases in which the appellant represented claimants before the Florida Industrial Commission. The other appel-lees were joined as the Florida Industrial Commission. The chancellor dismissed the original complaint, denying a temporary injunction, and subsequently dismissed an amended complaint with prejudice1.
The plaintiff was attempting to secure a blanket disqualification of a Deputy Industrial Commissioner from hearing any further claims in which he represented a claimant. It appears his action was improperly founded in two respects. Pursuant to the provisions of § 120.09, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. [commonly known as the Administrative Procedures Act], the correct method for seeking the disqualification of an administrative hearing officer is in accordance with the procedures available by statute for seeking the disqualification of a circuit judge, to wit: § 38.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We recognize that the reference to § 38.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., is contained only in subsection (1) of § 120.09, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., but an examination of the original title to this act2 clearly indicates the Legislative intent to make this method of disqualification available to appointed commissioners as well as to elected commissioners. See: Curry v. Lehman, 55 Fla. 847, 47 So. 18. Therefore, the method for seeking the disqualification of the appellee, Cardone, would be to follow the provisions of § 38.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and if he refused to recuse himself to seek appropriate review before the full Commission and the Supreme Court of Florida, which are the supervisory bodies of rulings made by Deputy Industrial Commissioners. See: §§ 440.25, 440.27, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
The plaintiff’s attack was further in error in that it sought a blanket disqualification of the Deputy Industrial Commissioners from “any cases” wherein the appellant represented claimants. This clearly is erroneous under Florida law. See: Ginsberg v. Holt, Fla. 1956, 86 So.2d 650.
Therefore, for the reasons stated, the final decree of dismissal here under review is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Robert E. Allen, Sr. v. Weimern and Lee E. Williams, 214 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)…lving moral turpitude. * * * If such charges are sustained by a majority vote of the full membership of the county board and such employee is discharged, his contract of employment shall be thereby canceled. * * * ” . Bieley v. Brown, Fla.App.1964, 168 So. 2d 552. . Board of Public Instruction of Taylor Co. v. State, Fla.App.1964, 171 So. 2d 209. . Sauls v. DeLoach, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 304. . F.S.1967, Section 120.011, F.S.A. . Kaulakis v. Boyd, Fla.1962, 138 So. 2d 505; Dade County v. Florida Assoc…
-
Meyer v. State, 402 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…ion failed to comply with the procedures for disqualification set forth in Section 38.10, Florida Statutes (1979), which apply to agency hearings. State ex rel. Allen v. Board of Public Instruction, 214 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Bieley v. Brown, 168 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). . This finding was unnecessary to the decision to suspend or revoke the trainers’ licenses. Under the absolute insurer rule, the trainers could be held responsible for racing drugged horses regardless of whether they knew of the…
-
State of Fla. ex rel. John M. Cannon v. Churchwell, 195 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)…mined that they have no property or financial interest in the result of the proceeding. Writ of prohibition denied. WALDEN, C. J., and HOBSON, T. FRANK, Jr., and SAMPLE, WALLACE, Associate Judges, concur. . See also Bieley v. Brown, Fla.App.1964, 168 So. 2d 552 (interpreting the Administrative Procedure Act). . See also generally: 48 C.J.S. Judges §§ 78-81; 30A Am.Jur., Judges, §§ 99-141; Annot., 10 A.L.R.2d 1307 (1950). . The mere fact that the commissioners are registered brokers would not, of course,…
Authorities Cited
- Curry v. Lehman, 55 Fla. 847 (Fla. 1908)
- Ginsberg v. Holt, 86 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1956)