FRANK W. TILLINGHAST, LEONARD L. BARBER, AND SAM A. FENNER, APPELLANTS,

v.

JOHN J. RICHARDS, MARSHAL OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Citator

Cited By

• W. Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (U.S. 1937)
  …f the latter act was sustained by the Supreme Court of Oregon in Stettler v. O’Hara, 69 Ore. 519; 139 Pac. 743, and Simpson v. O’Hara, 70 Ore. 261; 141 Pac. 158. These cases, after reargument, were affirmed here by an equally divided court, in 1917. 243 U. S. 629. The law of Oregon thus continued in effect. The District of Columbia Minimum Wage Law (40 Stat. 960) was enacted in 1918. The statute was sustained by the Supreme Court of the District in the Adkins case. Upon appeal the Court of Appeals of the Dis…
• Adkins v. Child's. Hosp. of the Dist. of Columbia, 261 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1923)
• Morehead v. NEW York ex rel. Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587 (U.S. 1936)
  …k act is free of that feature, so strongly denounced, the question comes before us in a new aspect. The Court was closely divided in the Adkins case, and that decision followed an equal division of the Court, after reargúment, in Stettler v. O’Hara, 243 U. S. 629, with respect to the validity of the minimum wage law of Oregon. Such divisions are at times unavoidable, but they point to the desirability of fresh consideration when there are material differences in the cases presented. The fact that in the Adki…

Authorities Cited

• Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1915)
• Lamar v. United States, 240 U.S. 60 (U.S. 1916)
• Franklin v. United States, 216 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1910)