WILLIAM W. WITHNELL, M. CECILE WITHNELL, HIS WIFE; MAUD E. HAGER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
WILLIAM R. BUSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
WILLIAM W. WITHNELL, M. CECILE WITHNELL, HIS WIFE; MAUD E. HAGER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
WILLIAM R. BUSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
243 U.S. 633
Supreme Court of the United States (1917)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Gast Realty Company v. Schneider Granite Company, 240 U. S. 55.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ex parte Park Square Automobile Station, 244 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1917)…ged error resulting from the refusal to remand was susceptible of being reviewed although no final judgment had been entered in the cause. At this term the writ of error taken for the purpose stated was dismissed because there was no final judgment, 243 U. S. 633, and thereupon on petition to that effect a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not be granted directing the District Court to reverse its ruling refusing to remand the cause was allowed and on a return of the District [*414] Court to that rule…
Authorities Cited
- Gast Realty & Inv. Co. v. Schneider Granite Co., 240 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1916)