STANDARD COMMODITIES CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
N. D. E., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-11-10
No. 64-757
Before CARROLL, TILLMAN PEAR'SON and HENDRY, JJ.
168 So. 2d 571 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's denial of a motion for summary judgment, holding that the chancellor did not abuse their discretion in deciding that the case required further evidence and argument.


Holding

No, the chancellor did not err in denying the motion for summary judgment.


Key Quotes

“With these affidavits before him the chancellor denied the motion for summary judment, presumably on the theory that the case should be decided after evidence on the issues and adversary argument.”

Describes the chancellor's reasoning for denying the motion for summary judgment.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Standard Commodities Corporation (appellant) filed a motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavits. The appellee, N. D. E., Inc., did not file …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is governed by the decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Ocean Villa Apartments v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 901, 902, wherein it was held:

“ * * * Motion for summary decree as authorized by 31 F.S.A. Equity Rule 40 supported by affidavits was then filed but no counter affidavits were filed by the city. This motion was denied and petitioners have brought that order here for review by certiorari.
“The point for determination is whether or not the chancellor committed error in denying petitioner’s motion for summary decree.
****** “ * * * With these affidavits before him the chancellor denied the motion for summary judment, presumably on the theory that the case should be decided after evidence on the issues and adversary argument. The chancellor had a reasonable discretion in the matter and we cannot see that it was abused, so we must decline to reverse him on this point.”

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw