HENDRICKSON, JUDGE OF THE COUNTY COURT OF TAYLOR COUNTY, KENTUCKY,

v.

CREAGER; SAME V. GARDNER; SAME V. HOCKER; SAME V. STERLING LAND & INVESTMENT COMPANY

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Duda v. Sterling MFG. Co., 178 F.2d 428 (8th Cir. 1949)
  …97. Nor in ordinary bankruptcy does the court have summary jurisdiction of an action to recover an alleged debt owing the bankrupt which the debtor denies. In re Eakin, 2 Cir., 154 F. 2d 717, 719; Kelley v. Gill, 245 U.S. 116, 120, 122, 38 S.Ct. 38, 62 L.Ed. 185; Morrison v. Bay Parkway National Bank, 2 Cir., 60 F. 2d 41, 42; In re Roman, 2 Cir., 23 F. 2d 556, 558; In re Joslyn’s Estate, 7 Cir., 168 F. 2d 803, 807; Maggio v. Zeitz, 333 U.S. 56, 63, 68 S.Ct. 401, 92 L.Ed. 476. In the Roman case the court sa…
• Warder v. Brady, 115 F.2d 89 (4th Cir. 1940)
  …this either in the original suit, Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U.S. 47, 49, 50, [*94] 15 S.Ct. 266, 39 L.Ed. 341; or by ancillary proceedings, White v. Ewing, 159 U.S. 36, 15 S.Ct. 1018, 40 L.Ed. 67. Compare Kelley v. Gill, 245 U.S. 116, 119, 38 S.Ct. 38, 62 L.Ed. 185. And it may, despite section 265 of the Judicial Code (28 U.S.C.A. § 379), issue under section 262 (28 U.S.C.A. § 377), or otherwise, all writs necessary to protect from interference all property in its possession. Julian v. Central Trust Co., 193 U…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Broderick v. Am. Gen. Corp., 71 F.2d 864 (4th Cir. 1934)
  …defendant, and the issues between them, and the adverse party are not necessarily identical.” And see United States v. Bitter Root Development Co., 2001 U. S. 451, 479, 26 S. Ct. 318, 50 L. Ed. 550; Kelley v. Gill, 245 U. S. 116, 120, 38 S. Ct. 38, 62 L. Ed. 185; New Jersey & N. C. Land & Lumber Co. v. Gardner-Lacy Lumber Co. (C. C. A. 4th) 178 F. 772, 783 ; Buchanan Co. v. Adkins (C. C. A. 4th) 175 F. 692, 701; Carey v. McMillan (C. C. A. 8th) 289 F. 380. But there is no occasion to examine at large quest…