KETCHAM
v.
BURR ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In May 1906, a man committed to a Michigan insane asylum filed a federal bill in equity in 1912 alleging that state court officials and asylum administrators had conspired to deprive him of liberty and money, seeking to void his insanity adjudication and recover documents from the institution. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the case involved only state law matters concerning commitment procedures and did not present a substantial federal constitutional question.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court.
Having heard the cause upon bill, answer and replication, the District Court dismissed the bill. In support of this direct appeal it is said that the construction or application of the Federal Constitution is involved. Judicial Code, § 238.
The defendants are the corporation which owns and operates Oak Grove asylum in Genesee County, Michigan; the medical director and chief guard of that institution; the present and a former judge, and also the present and a former register of the Probate Court of Genesee County; two .examining physicians who upon an inquest held before that court certified complainants insanity; and the attorney who represented the petitioner therein.
The bill is a nebulous recital of grievances against defendants and many others — all alleged to have been wicked conspirators seeking to deprive appellant of his liberty and money. It appears that the appellant, a citizen of Indiana, having effected his escape from an insane asylum in Wisconsin was taken by his family and friends to Oak Grove for medical care and treatment in May, 1906; and that directly thereafter a petition asking an inquisition concerning his sanity was duly presented to the Probate Court by the superintendent of that institution as provided by a state statute. After a hearing he was adjudged insane and corqmitted for treatment; the right to appeal was not exercised. In October, 1906, he escaped, and this bill was filed May 11, 1912, without prior, application for relief to any court of the State. It prays (1) that defendants be required to give an account of and restore to complainant all writings, letters, documents and papers placed in their hands in connection with the inquisition, and (2) that the judge and register of the Probate Court be required to set aside and hold for naught the pretended inquisition in insanity and make adequate entry accordingly oh the record.
All equities of the bill are fully denied in the answer; and the claim that the cause really involves construction or application of the Federal Constitution is without foundation.
We have no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and it must be
Dismissed.