CINCINNATI, HAMILTON & DAYTON RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
JOSEPH M. MCCOLLUM, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH WILLIAM ROEBUCK

U.S. | 1917-11-26
No. 57
245 U.S. 632 Supreme Court of the United States (1917) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 52, 53; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 235; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 240 U. S. 518.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. Minnesota, 322 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1944)
    …127 U. S. 117, 123-4; Pullman’s Car Co. v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S. 18; American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Hall, 174 U. S. 70; Union Transit Co. v. Lynch, 177 U. S. 149; Union Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U. S. 194; Germania Refining Co. v. Fuller, 245 U. S. 632; Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright, 249 U. S. 275; Johnson Oil Co. v. Oklahoma, 290 U. S. 158. If the tax levied here were held to be exclusive of all property taxes imposed on petitioner’s airplanes by other states there could be no serious question o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw