MENASHA WOODEN WARE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY
MENASHA WOODEN WARE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY
245 U.S. 633
Supreme Court of the United States (1917)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with -.costs upon the authority of Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 209 U. S. 56, 80 et seq.; Louis. & Nash. R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467; Portland Railway &c. Co. v. Railroad Commission of Oregon, 229 U. S. 397, 412, 413; New York Central & Hudson River R. r. Co. v. Gray, 239 U. S. 583.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clark v. Allen, 331 U.S. 503 (U.S. 1947)…citizen or subject of the other . . . .” pp. 447-448. That decision was made in 1860. In 1917 the Court followed it in cases involving three other treaties. Petersen v. Iowa, 245 U. S. 170; Duus v. Brown, 245 U. S. 176; Skarderud v. Tax Commission, 245 U. S. 633. The construction adopted by those cases is, to say the least, permissible when the syntax of the sentences dealing with realty and personalty is considered. So far as realty is concerned, the testator includes “any person”; and the property covere…
-
Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (U.S. 1968)…e no interpretation of the Constitution, and this is what the Ashwander rules seek to bring about. Cf. Swift & Co., Inc. v. Wickham, 382 U. S. 111, 126-127. Petersen v. Iowa, 245 U. S. 170; Duus v. Brown, 245 U. S. 176; Skarderud v. Tax Commission, 245 U. S. 633. The statute appears in the majority opinion in n. 1, ante, at 430. The appellees argue that a substantial part of the 1923 treaty has been terminated or abrogated by the 1954 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation with the Federal Republic…
Authorities Cited
- Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 209 U.S. 56 (U.S. 1908)
- Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U.S. 467 (U.S. 1911)
- N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R. Co. v. Gray, 239 U.S. 583 (U.S. 1916)
- Portland Railway v. R.R. Comm'n of Or., 229 U.S. 397 (U.S. 1913)