ROSTELL JUSTICE, PETITIONER,

v.

WARREN LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS, INC., CASUALTY RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE, AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Montgomery v. State, 176 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1965)
  …2 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799. We need not discuss the question of whether an arraignment under our law, as it now exists (compare Ex Parte Jeffcoat, 1933, 109 Fla. 207, 146 So. 827, with our recent decision in Sardinia v. State, Fla.1964, 168 So. 2d 674) is “a critical stage” in all felony prosecutions in this state, since, as noted above, the appellant here had the assistance of counsel at his arraignment. We think it is clear, however, that a preliminary hearing in this state is not, ordinarily,…
• In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)
  …t of the trial, as apparently it is under Alabama law. In Ex parte Jeffcoat, 109 Fla. 207, 146 So. 827, the Supreme Court of Florida held the arraignment to be a mere formal preliminary step to an answer or plea. However, in Sardinia v. State, Fla., 168 So. 2d 674, the court recognized the accused’s right to counsel upon arraignment. FS 909.21 provides for appointment of counsel in capital cases. RULE 1.170 PLEAS (a) Type of Pleas; Court’s Discretion in Accepting. — A defendant may plead not guilty, guilty,…
• Reuel Lawson v. State, 231 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1970)
  …lty and sentenced them * * If defendant had counsel for the first time at sentencing, he waived lack of counsel at arraignment when he made no request or motions at sentencing, but stood on his plea of guilty made at arraignment. Sardinia v. State, 168 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1964). This entry in the Minute Book does not “conclusively show” that M. O’Quinn represented defendant at the time of sentencing. Summary denial, therefore, was improper and the defendant should be granted a hearing on this question. [*209] At…