ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MRS. MARSHALL LANIS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF MARSHALL LANIS, DECEASED

U.S. | 1918-03-18
No. 320
246 U.S. 652 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 576; Illinois Surety Co. v. United States, 240 U. S. 214, 221; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S. 290, 293-294.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R. Co. v. Kinney, 260 U.S. 340 (U.S. 1922)
  • Damiano v. Pa. R. Co., 161 F.2d 534 (3d Cir. 1947)
    …. 1098; Broom v. Southern Ry. in Mississippi, 1917, 115 Miss. 493, 76 So. 525; Curtice v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 1916, 162 Wis. 421, 156 N.W. 484, L.R.A.1916D, 316; Lanis v. Illinois Central R. Co., 1917, 140 La. 1, 72 So. 788, affirmed per curiam, 246 U.S. 652, 38 S.Ct 334, 62 L.Ed. 922.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw