DONALD A. CURRAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

CHICAGO SHORT LINE RAILWAY COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Ex parte Sw. Sur. Ins. Co., 247 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1918)
  …ed so certain is. this the case that .as to the principal one of the questions, the power of the court, when raised at this term it was treated as not open to controversy and was hence disposed of by a per curiam opinion. Hopkins v. Ellington & Guy, 246 U. S. 655. The one subject which we postponed considering is the contention that rights of some of the claimants were asserted after the one-year period of limitation which the statute fixes. But this depends upon facts which are not before us, and besides i…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bachelder, 120 F.2d 574 (7th Cir. 1941)
  …upon the prior leave of a state receivership court. Mc-Nulta v. Lockridge, 137 Ill. 270, 27 N.E. 452, 31 Am.St.Rep. 362, Id., 141 U.S. 327, 12 S.Ct. 11, 35 L.Ed. 796; United States v. Illinois Surety Co., D.C., 238 F. 840; Hopkins v. United States, 246 U.S. 655, 38 S.Ct. 423, 62 L.Ed. 924; United States v. Federal Surety Co., 4 Cir., 72 F. 2d 961. Equally unsound is the contention that the Act does not apply to a receivership. § 10(a) of the Act empowers the Board to prevent any person from engaging in an…
• United States v. Fed. Sur. Co., 72 F.2d 961 (4th Cir. 1934)
  …he subject. The proper procedure to be followed in a ease of this sort was indicated by the decision of Judge Connor in United States v. Illinois Surety Company (D. C.) 238 F. 840, which was affirmed without opinion in Hopkins, Receiver, v. U. S., 246 U. S. 655, 38 S. Ct. 423, 62 L. Ed. 924. Suit was filed under the Hurd Act (40 USCA § 270) against the public contractor and the Illinois Surety Company, the surety on the contractor’s bond, in a federal eourt in North Carolina, a short time after Hopkins ha…

Authorities Cited

• Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U.S. 236 (U.S. 1914)
• Interstate Amusement Co. v. Albert, 239 U.S. 560 (U.S. 1916)