EDWARD B. PRYOR AND EDWARD F. KEARNEY, RECEIVERS OF THE WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
LAURA CHRISTY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD F. CHRISTY, DECEASED
EDWARD B. PRYOR AND EDWARD F. KEARNEY, RECEIVERS OF THE WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
LAURA CHRISTY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD F. CHRISTY, DECEASED
246 U.S. 656
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United Transp. Union v. Drew Lewis, 711 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1983)…etween cars, it violates the statute as fully as if the appliances were defective or it had failed to install the prop [*250] er appliances. 173 S.W. 2d at 855 (citing Christy v. Wabash Ry., 195 Mo.App. 232, 191 S.W. 241, 244 (1916), writ dismissed, 246 U.S. 656, 38 S.Ct. 424, 62 L.Ed. 924 (1918)). Crabtree is distinguishable on its facts from the present case. Here Seaboard has not imposed a procedure such that switch-men cannot operate the couplers as they are designed to be operated — i.e., from outside…