COOPER HEWITT ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Mich. Carton Co. v. Sutherland Paper Co., 29 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1928)
  …hat was already reasonably indicated to be within the invention; and this rule applies with special force where the insertion was required by the Patent Office. General Electric Co. v. Cooper, etc., Co. (C. C. A. 6) 249 F. 61, 64, certiorari denied 246 U. S. 668, 38 S. Ct. 336, 62 L. Ed. 930. And if an inventor comes to better understand the principles of his invention while his application for patent is pending, an amendment of his claim to conform thereto does not introduce any original matter nor enlarg…
• H. H. Robertson Co. v. Klauer MFG. Co., 98 F.2d 150 (8th Cir. 1938)
  …, 180 U.S. 383, 386, 21 S.Ct. 409, 45 L.Ed. 586; Insulite Co. v. Reserve Supply Co., 8 Cir., 60 F. 2d 433, 435; In re Curtis, Cust. & Pat.App., 81 F. 2d 236, 238; General Elec. Co. v. Cooper Hewitt Elec. Co., 6 Cir., 249 F. 61, 64, certiorari denied 246 U.S. 668, 38 S.Ct. 336, 62 L.Ed. 930; Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp., 2 Cir., 220 F. 118, 124; Western Elec. Co. v. Sperry Elec. Co., 7 Cir., 58 F. 186, 196. (3) Claims vague and indefinite. This attack is aimed at the statement in the claims des…