ATLANTIC, GULF & PACIFIC COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES; AND UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. ATLANTIC, GULF & PACIFIC COMPANY
ATLANTIC, GULF & PACIFIC COMPANY, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES; AND UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. ATLANTIC, GULF & PACIFIC COMPANY
247 U.S. 504
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs by an equally divided ..court. (Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration and decision of these cases.)..
Mr. George A. King, Mr. William B. King and Mr. W. E. Harvey for Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Company. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Thompson and Mr. P. M. Ashford for the United States.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara Weitzman, 426 F.2d 439 (8th Cir. 1970)…v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413 (1918); Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414 (1918); Yanyar v. United States, 246 U.S. 649, 38 S.Ct. 332, 62 L.Ed. 920 (1918); and Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504, 38 S.Ct. 579, 62 L.Ed. 1239 (1918). The issue in these World War I cases seems to me to have arisen in a more difficult context because the statute there under consideration restricted the exemption to members of qualifying religious sects and made…