LARGE OIL COMPANY
v.
E. B. HOWARD, STATE AUDITOR OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

U.S. | 1919-01-27
No. 160
248 U.S. 549 Supreme Court of the United States (1919) Negative Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs, and cause remanded for further proceedings, upon the authority of Choctaw & Gulf R. R. Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292; Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Oklahoma, 240 U. S. 522. And see Howard v. Oil Companies, 247 U. S. 503.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Carpenter v. Shaw, 280 U.S. 363 (U.S. 1930)
    …on an instrumentality of the national government. See Choctaw & Gulf R. Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292; Jaybird Mining Co. v. Weir, 271 U. S. 609; Gillespie v. Oklahoma, 257 U. S. 501; Howard v. Gipsy Oil Co., 247 U. S. 503; Large Oil Co. v. Howard, 248 U. S. 549. But it is urged that as the restrictions have now been removed, Congress, by its attempted repeal of the exemption and by later legislation of May 10, 1928, 45 Stat. 496, subjecting oil and gas, produced from restricted allotted lands of members of…
  • Gillespie v. State of Okla., 257 U.S. 501 (U.S. 1922)
    …to gross production taxes under a later .statute of 1916, without reference to the fact that the taxes, instead of being in addition to, were in lieu of all taxes upon property rights. Howard v. Gipsy Oil Co., 247 U. S. 503. Large Oil Co. v. Howard, 248 U. S. 549. The argument for the State is based primarily upon the cases sustaining taxes upon net income that include gains from interstate commerce, Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U. S. 37, 57; United States Glue Co. v. Oak Creek, 247 U. S. 321; when “ all expenses…
  • Helvering v. Mountain Producers Corp., 303 U.S. 376 (U.S. 1938)
    …U. S. 516. Citing Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292. Citing Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292; Indian Territory Oil Co. v. Oklahoma, 240 U. S. 522; Howard v. Gipsy Oil Co., 247 U. S. 503; Large Oil Co. v. Howard, 248 U. S. 549. As to taxability of gains from interstate commerce, see U. S. Glue Co. v. Oak Creek, 247 U. S. 321; Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U. S. 37, 57. In Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U. S. 393, 399, 400, it is stated that Gillespie v. Oklahoma has oft…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw