BLACK MOUNTAIN RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

LEONA MUMPOWER, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Union Tool Co. v. Wilson, 259 U.S. 107 (U.S. 1922)
  …derreamers. He obtained a decree for an injunction and an accounting, 237 Fed. 847, which was affirmed by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 249 Fed. 736; and a petition for writ of certiorari was denied by this court, 248 U. S. 559. Thereafter, a writ, of injunction issued which forbade the manufacture and sale, not only of infringing machines, but also of parts or elements that might be used in combination to effect infringement. [*109] Wilson claimed that there had been deli…
• Magnavox Co. v. Hart & Reno, 73 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1934)
  …not infringe.” (Italics our own.) Other decisions by this court to- the same effect are to bo found in the, following casos: Eaid v. Twohy Bros. Co., 230 F. 444, 447; Wilson & Willard Mfg. Co. v. Union Tool Co., 249 F. 729, 731, certiorari denied, 248 U. S. 559, 39 S. Ct. 6, 63 L. Ed. 421; Pacific States Electric Co. v. Wright, 277 F. 756, 758; Overlin v. Dallas Machine & Locomotive Works, 297 F. 7,12; International Harvester Co. v. Killefer Mfg. Co., 67 F.(2d) 54, 62. Accordingly, our way charted by the…
• Angelus Sanitary Can Mach. Co. v. Wilson, 7 F.2d 314 (9th Cir. 1925)
  …eeentric encircling ring” are not found in the amendment to claim 2; nor is the claim limited to exact features, as, for example, was the claim discussed in Wilson & Willard Mfg. Co. v. Union Tool Co., 249 F. 729, 161 C. C. A. 639, certiorari denied 248 U. S. 559, 39 S. Ct. 6, 63 L. Ed. 421. Therefore there should be no meaning put upon the words “encircling can top” by which thei’e is a limitation to the eeeentric encircling ring, unless the specifications and the drawings, which showed eccentric rings, tak…