MONTEZUMA VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT ET AL.

v.

MARK NORRIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jinkins v. Entzminger, 102 Fla. 167 (Fla. 1931)
  …collected, but requires that there be a sufficient assessment and levy and collection of the taxes as levied to actually pay the debt. Norris v. Montezuma Irrigation District, 248 Fed. 369, approved by U. S. Supreme Court by denial of certiorari in 248 U. S. 569. But except to complete payment of outstanding indebtedness, the taxing power of the Upper St. Johns River Navigation District must be regarded as having ceased because the object of the district itself has1 failed. We have no doubt that in a prope…
• State ex rel. James P. Taliaferro v. Baskin, 113 Fla. 115 (Fla. 1933)
  …assessments or other means of paying them when due, have failed to result in actual payment. Klemm v. Davenport, 100 Fla. 627, 129 Sou. Rep. 904; Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation Dist., 248 Fed. 369, Montezuma Valley Irrigation Dist. v. Norris, 248 U. S. 569, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 10, 63 L. Ed. 425; State ex rel. Dos Amigos v. Lehman, 100 Fla. 1313, 131 Sou. Rep. 533. This is an age old, but lawful inequity, when it occurs in the exercise of general taxing powers pledged to pay a municipality’s bonded debts.…
• Town of Columbus v. Barringer, 85 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1936)
  …400, 119 S.E. 166. Moran, v. State, 111 Fla. 429, 149 So. 477; Jewell v. City of Superior (C.C.A.) 135 F. 19, certiorari denied 198 U.S. 583, 25 S.Ct. 801, 49 L.Ed. 1173; Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist. (C.C.A.) 248 F. 369, certiorari denied 248 U.S. 569, 39 S.Ct. 10, 63 L.Ed. 425; Rohwer v. Gibson, 126 Cal.App. 707, 14 P.(2d) 1051; Thomas v. Patterson, 61 Colo. 547, 159 P. 34; People ex rel. Decker v. City of Park Ridge, 275 Ill.App. 97; People v. Treasurer of Monroe County, 191 N.Y. 15, 83 N.E. 66…