PAUL H. KING ET AL., RECEIVERS, ETC.,

v.

EDWIN L. BOYD

Citator

Cited By

• The Garrett Corp. v. The United States, 422 F.2d 874 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
  …d with the art to which the document relates and thus most likely to avail themselves of its contents. Jockmus v. Leviton, 28 F. 2d 812 (2d Cir. 1928); Camp Bros. & Co. v. Portable Wagon Dump & Elevator Co., 251 F. 603 (7th Cir, 1917), cert. denied, 248 U.S. 572, 39 S.Ct. 11, 63 L.Ed. 427 (1918); I.C.E. Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 250 F.Supp. 738 (S.D.N.Y.1966). Factors bearing on whether a document was published include the number of copies made, availability, accessibility, dissemination, and even inten…
• Application of John William Bayer, 568 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1978)
  …C. § 102(b). . Rosenwasser v. Speith, 129 U.S. 47, 9 S.Ct. 229, 32 L.Ed. 628 (1889); Imperial Glass Co. v. A. H. Heisey & Co., 294 F. 267 (C.A. 6 1923); Camp Bros. & Co. v. Portable Wagon Dump & Elevator Co., 251 F. 603 (C.A. 7 1917), cert. denied, 248 U.S. 572, 39 S.Ct. 11, 63 L.Ed. 427 (1918); Interchemical Corp. v. Sinclair & Carroll Co., 50 F.Supp. 881 (D.C.N.Y.1943), rev’d on other grounds, 144 F. 2d 842 (C.A. 2 1944), rev’d on other grounds, 325 U.S. 327, 65 S.Ct. 1143, 89 L.Ed. 1644 (1945). . Altho…