THOMAS J. MOONEY

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1935)
  …h an application that the Court said that the injured party was “ without remedy.” People v. Mooney, 178 Cal. 525; 174 Pac. 325. And it was with respect to that proceeding, that the writ of certiorari was denied by this Court. Mooney v. California, 248 U. S. 579. The subsequent communications from the Justices of the Supreme Court in connection with applications for executive clemency were of an advisory character and were not judicial judgments under the requirements of the Constitution of the United State…
• In re Mooney, 72 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1934)
  …Court of the state of California, where the judgment and order wore affirmed. The ease of People v. Mooney, on appeal, is reported in 175 Cal. 666, 166 P. 999; 176 Cal. 105, 167 P. 696; 177 Cal. 642, 171 P. 690; 178 Cal. 525, 174 P. 325, and also in 248 U. S. 579, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 430, where the Supreme Court of the United States refused to grant certiorari to review the proceeding of the Supreme Court of California as reported in 178 Cal. 525, 174 P. 325. Petitioner contends that by reason of certai…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hodge v. Evans Fin. Corp., 823 F.2d 559 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …bmit the bylaws themselves, however. The District Court’s refusal to give the requested instruction appears to have been correct under the law of the District of Columbia. See Newbold v. Brennan Construction Co., 48 App.D.C. 90 (D.C.), cert. denied, 248 U.S. 579, 39 S.Ct. 21, 63 L.Ed. 430 (1918), cited with approval in International Tours & Travel, Inc. v. Khalil, 491 A. 2d 1149, 1154 (D.C.1985). In Newbold, the plaintiff sought to recover damages for breach of a ten-year employment contract executed by the…