I. F. SEARLE ET AL.

v.

MECHANICS LOAN & TRUST COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp., 561 U.S. 89 (U.S. 2010)
  …cludes a receiving rail carrier. The conclusion that Carmack’s bill of lading requirement only applies to the receiving rail carrier is dictated by the text and is consistent with this Court’s precedent. See St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Starbird, 248 U. S. 592, 604 (1917) (explaining that Carmack “requires the receiving carrier to issue a through bill of lading”). A receiving rail carrier is the initial carrier, which “receives” the property for domestic rail transportation at the journey’s point of origi…
• Geist v. Prudence Realization Corp., 122 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1941)
  …as was done in St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Champion Shoe Machinery Co., 8 Cir., 109 F. 2d 313; Bird & Sons Sales Corp. v. Tobin, 8 Cir., 78 F. 2d 371, 100 A.L.R. 654; and Searle v. Mechanics’ Loan & Trust Co., 9 Cir., 249 F. 942, cer-tiorari denied 248 U.S. 592, 39 S.Ct. 67, 63 L.Ed. 437, even though there appears to be authority contra to the effect that the enforcement of such agreements, not amounting to assignment of a claim, is entirely collateral to the interests of the estate and outside the bankrup…
• Austin v. Nat'l Disc. Corp., 322 F.2d 928 (4th Cir. 1963)
  …78, 65 S.Ct. 191, 89 L.Ed. 622 (1944); In re Aktiebolaget Kreuger & Toll, 96 F. 2d 768 (2 Cir. 1938); In re George C. Bruns Co., 256 F. 840 (7 Cir. 1919); Searle v. Mechanics’ Loan & Trust Co., 249 F. 942 (9 Cir. 1918), petition for cert. dismissed, 248 U.S. 592, 593, 39 S.Ct. 67, 63 L.Ed. 437 (1918); Cf. Prudence Realization Corp. v. Geist, 316 U.S. 89, 62 S.Ct. 978, 86 L.Ed. 1293 (1942). Although creditors may not reap the fruits of transactions in which they have joined with the debtor to defraud other…