STATE OF CALIFORNIA
v.
MONO COUNTY IRRIGATION COMPANY

U.S. | 1919-03-10
No. 208
249 U.S. 581 Supreme Court of the United States (1919) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Suburban Improvement Co. v. Scott Lumber Co., 67 F.2d 335 (4th Cir. 1933)
    …t could not sue for specific performance after electing to treat the contract as broken and proceeding on the theory that the rights of defendant thereunder were at an end. 6 R. C. L. 1926; 13 C. J. 651, 653; Central Trust Co. v. Chicago Auditorium, 249 U. S. 581, 589, 36 S. Ct. 412, 69 L. Ed. 811, L. R. A. 1917B, 589; Bare v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co., 73 W. Va. 632, 89 S. E. 941. For the reasons stated, the decree appealed from will be affirmed. Affirmed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw