CHESAPEAKE & OHIO COAL & COKE COMPANY
v.
TOLEDO & OHIO CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO COAL & COKE COMPANY
TOLEDO & OHIO CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY
249 U.S. 585
Supreme Court of the United States (1919)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 128 of the Judicial Code; Stevenson v. Fain, 195 U. S. 165, 166; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Tex. E. Transmission Corp., 533 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1976)…sportation has been completed, may be lawfully increased, or the free time curtailed, upon and after the statutory notice. Chesapeake & Ohio Coal & Coke Co. v. Toledo & O. C. Ry., 245 F. 917, 919 (4th Cir. 1917), dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 249 U.S. 585, 39 S.Ct. 289, 63 L.Ed. 788 (1919) (per curiam). There is little doubt that the ICC, in promulgating the change of rate here, regarded the detention of cars beyond the free period of two days, which was not changed, as not a necessary part of trans…
Authorities Cited
- Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712 (U.S. 1914)
- Delaware v. Yurkonis, 238 U.S. 439 (U.S. 1915)
- Stevenson v. Fain, 195 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1904)
- Roman Catholic Church of ST. Anthony of Padua v. The Pa. R.R. Co., 237 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1915)