JAMES KENNEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Wheatley v. United States, 159 F.2d 599 (4th Cir. 1946)
  …ited States, 2 Cir., 293 F. 532, 547, certiorari denied 263 U.S. 713, 44 S.Ct. 38, 68 L.Ed. 520; Howenstine v. United States, 9 Cir., 263 F. 1, 4; Holsman v. United States, 9 Cir., 248 F. 193, 195, certiorari denied sub nom Freeman v. United States, 249 U.S. 600, 39 S.Ct. 258, 63 L.Ed. 796. It is also urged that the indictment is defective because it was not signed by the United States Attorney for the Northern District of West Virginia. It was in-fact signed by one of the assistant United States attorneys…
• Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State of Russia, 21 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1927)
  …e railroad company within the meaning of the Carmack Amendment.” See, also, same ruling by New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals, New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Ins. Co. v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 92 N. J. Law, 467, 105 A. 206, certiorari denied 249 U. S. 600, 39 S. Ct. 258, 63 L. Ed. 796. [*402] [20] ' The' railroad company now contends that the .acts of Congress, the Interstate Commerce Commission regulations for the transportation of explosives (Federal Explosives Law, Criminal Code, §§ 233, 235 [Comp…
• United States v. Arondus Lee Wilson, 450 F.2d 495 (4th Cir. 1971)
  …1789 to 1891, is thought to have been removed by implication when appellate jurisdiction was transferred from the federal circuit courts to the newly created courts of appeals. Freeman v. United States, 243 F. 353, 357 (9th Cir. 1917), cert, denied, 249 U.S. 600, 39 S.Ct. 258, 63 L.Ed. 796 (1919). Contra, Smith v. United States, 273 F. 2d 462, 468-469 (10th Cir. 1959) (Murrah, C. J., dissenting). Thus, until the Supreme Court or the Congress restores bur power, we cannot modify sentences even when we deem t…