IOWA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

J. W. BREEN

Citator

Cited By

• Mosher v. Tate, 182 F.2d 475 (9th Cir. 1950)
  …de as required by Admiralty Rule 10, 28 U.S.C.A. However, this omission did not defeat the jurisdiction of the court or serve to prejudice the rights of appellees. St. Charles Amusement & Transp. Co. v. Elhardt, 8 Cir., 254 F. 275, certiorari denied 249 U.S. 604, 39 S.Ct. 260, 63 L.Ed. 798. Prior to trial the parties agreed on the form of a proposed restraining order which would have permitted a limited release of the vessel for fishing purposes only. To protect appellant the proctor for appellant was made…
• Ex parte Aubert (N.D. Cal. 1931)
  …ginal sentence, but merely changed the previous direction as to the time when imprisonment should begin. When the order is so eon- [*139] sidered, as properly it should be, the other contentions of appellant are made to disappear.” Certiorari denied 249 U. S. 604, 39 S. Ct. 260, 63 L. Ed. 798. The petition will be denied and an order made by this court directing that the sentence of imprisonment entered on September 19, 1929, shall begin to run upon the date .of the expiration of the sentence under the stat…