THE BISIGHT COMPANY ET AL.

v.

ONEPIECE BIFOCAL LENS COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 309 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1940)
  …o oil held by trustee in 77B, abuse of discretion). 5 Remington on Bankruptcy, 4th Ed., §§ 2045, 2370. Cf. Ex parte Baldwin, supra, 619. Cf. Steelman v. All Continent Co., 301 U. S. 278. See Scott v. Gillespie, 103 Kan. 745; 176 P. 132, cert. den. 249 U. S. 606 (trustee ordered into state court for construction of will to determine estate, if any, taken thereunder by bankrupt). Cf. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U. S. 64.…
• Application of Edward Burton LeGRICE, 301 F.2d 929 (C.C.P.A. 1962)
  …the prior publication described the article.” The solicitor also cites in support of the board’s position, the decision of the District Court of Maryland in One-Piece Bifocal Lens Co. v. Bisight Co., 246 F. 450, mod. 259 F. 275 (CCA 4), cert. den. 249 U.S. 606, 39 S.Ct. 288, 63 L.Ed. 799. At page 457, of 246 F. the Court stated: “The description under consideration is one which does not tell how to make the article it describes. It is one published at a time when those skilled in the art would not either…
• Rosenberg v. Baum, 153 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1946)
  …the right and acquired other property which was held as part of the estate, that any property passed to the remainder-men at her death. Postlethwaite v. Edson, 98 Kan. 444, 155 P. 802; Scott v. Gillespie, 103 Kan. 745, 176 P. 132, certiorari denied 249 U.S. 606, 39 S.Ct. 289, 63 L.Ed. 799; Otis v. Otis, supra. And in a case of this kind for an accounting, brought by the re- ■ maindermen under the will against the personal representatives of the estate of the deceased executrix, who was also life tenant of…