W. D. RENFRO
v.
CHARLES OLENTINE ET AL.
W. D. RENFRO
CHARLES OLENTINE ET AL.
249 U.S. 614
Supreme Court of the United States (1919)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. Sternberg, 71 F.2d 157 (8th Cir. 1934)…and by the Sixth Circuit that a receiver is not an adverse claimant as to an allowance for services made to and received by him, after notice of bankruptcy proceedings (In re Diamond’s Estate, 260 F. 70, 75, certiorari denied Frankenstein v. Jacobs, 249 U. S. 614, 30 S. Ct. 388, 63 L. Ed. 802). Even as to the funds or property held by him as such receiver he is not an adverse claimant.’ In re Watts & Sachs, 190 U. S. 1, 27, 23 S. Ct. 718, 47 L. Ed. 933; In re Diamond’s Estate, supra (C. C. A.) page 74 of 259…