UNION SULPHUR COMPANY

v.

FREEPORT TEXAS COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Walker, 145 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
  …22, 36 L.Ed. 266. Burleson v. United States ex rel. Workingmen’s Co-Op. Pub. Ass’n, 51 App.D.C. 65, 274 F. 749, error dismissed, 260 U.S. 757, 43 S.Ct. 246, 67 L.Ed. 499; Magon v. United States, 9 Cir., 248 F. 201, 160 C.C.A. 279, certiorari denied 249 U.S. 618, 39 S.Ct 391, 63 L.Ed. 804. 7 Wall. 482, 487, 19 L.Ed. 278. The Court also said, in support of its conclusion: “The common sense of man approves the judgment mentioned by Puffendorf, that the Bolognian law which enacted, ‘that whoever drew blood in…
• Fitzgerald v. Liberian S/T Chryssi P. Goulandris, 582 F.2d 312 (4th Cir. 1978)
  …f apparently argued that, reading § 596 too literally, Kapsis was due full payment of wages in Boston on June 25 because the vessel had discharged its cargo there. The trial court, however, following The Cubadist, 256 F. 203 (5th Cir.), cert. den., 249 U.S. 618, 39 S.Ct. 392, 63 L.Ed. 804 (1919), held that § 596 was intended to refer “only to the discharge of cargo after the completion of the voyage for which the seaman shipped.” Plaintiff’s interpretation, the court reasoned, would have required payment w…
• SU v. M/V Southern Aster, 978 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1992)
  …by completion of his contract or by premature discharge. See, e.g., Mavromatis v. United Greek Shipowners Corp., 179 F. 2d 310, 318-19 (1st Cir.1949); The Cubadist, 252 F. 658, 660, 662-63 (S.D.Ala. 1918), aff'd, 256 F. 203 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 249 U.S. 618, 39 S.Ct. 392, 63 L.Ed. 804 (1919). Under this definition, the Griffin and Chung seafarers had completed their voyages when they were discharged, even though the ships never left port. Applying this definition, the PINE FOREST seafarers were not en…