E. GOUGE ET AL.
v.
JOHN M. HART, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.
E. GOUGE ET AL.
JOHN M. HART, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.
251 U.S. 542
Supreme Court of the United States (1920)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allen v. Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., 304 U.S. 439 (U.S. 1938)…arose. (U. S. C., Title 26, § 1551.) Sec. 3224. No suit for the purpose of restrainmg the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court. (U. S. C., Title 26, § 1543.) Gouge v. Hart, 250 F. 802 (W. D. Va.), appeal dismissed, 251 U. S. 542; Ralston v. Heiner, 24 F. 2d 416 (C. C. A. 3d); Calkins v. Smietanka, 240 F. 138 (N. D. Ill.); Seaman v. Guaranty Trust Co., 1 F. 2d 391 (S. D. N. Y.). Lipke v. Lederer, 259 U. S. 557; Regal Drug Corp. v. Wardell, 260 U. S. 386. Miller v. Nut Marg…
Authorities Cited
- Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. W. Union Tel. Co., 234 U.S. 369 (U.S. 1914)
- Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1905)
- Male for Chapin v. Atchison, 240 U.S. 97 (U.S. 1916)
- Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1914)