CHEATHAM ELECTRIC SWITCHING DEVICE COMPANY
v.
TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ET AL.
CHEATHAM ELECTRIC SWITCHING DEVICE COMPANY
TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ET AL.
252 U.S. 567
Supreme Court of the United States (1920)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 332-334; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519, 522; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412, 416. And see Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Co. v. United Thacker Coal Co., 248 U. S. 531.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Cheek, 259 U.S. 530 (U.S. 1922)…treating this decision of the Supreme Court as a final judgment reviewable by writ of error from this court, sued out such a writ, and upon the ground that the judgment [*534] was not final under the state law the cause was dismissed March 8, 1920. 252 U. S. 567. Thereafter it was submitted to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, which in conformity to the former opinion of the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment (223 S. W. 754), overruled a motion for rehearing and refused an application for certification of th…
-
POE v. John Deere Co., 695 F.2d 1103 (8th Cir. 1982)…as quit such service.” People have been litigating service-letter claims in Missouri at least since a private cause of action to effectuate the statute was recognized in Cheek v. Prudential Ins. Co., 192 S.W. 387, 389-90 (Mo.1916), appeal dismissed, 252 U.S. 567, 40 S.Ct. 343, 64 L.Ed. 719 (1920). By the time Poe I went to trial the statute’s validity had been successfully attacked in Rimmer v. Colt Industries Operating Corp., 495 F.Supp. 1217 (W.D.Mo.1980), rev’d, 656 F. 2d 323 (8th Cir.1981),7 but there…
-
Parker v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1948)…re “should bind us unless so unfair or unreasonable in its application to those asserting a federal right as to obstruct it.” 269 U. S. 190, 195. These questions are discussed in 328 Ill. App. 46 and 396 Ill. 583. Cf. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Cheek, 252 U. S. 567, 259 U. S. 530. It has been suggested that on the record we cannot ascertain whether the Illinois Supreme Court’s denial of review of the order of January 15th was on federal or state grounds. But when the only purpose of review under state law can…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U.S. 31 (U.S. 1893)
- Metro. Water Co. v. Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte Cnty., 223 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1912)
- Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U.S. 325 (U.S. 1912)
- Shapiro v. United States, 235 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1914)
- Red Jacket, Jr. v. United Thacker Coal Co., 248 U.S. 531 (U.S. 1918)