MCCAY ENGINEERING COMPANY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Midland Realty Co. v. Kan. City Power & Light Co., 300 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1937)
  …9, §§ 5190 (12), 5209. Fulton v. Public Service Comm’n, 275 Mo. 67; 204 S. W. 386; Sedalia v. Public Service Comm’n, 275 Mo. 201, 209; 204 S. W. 497; Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co. v. Kansas City Light & Power Co., 275 Mo. 529; 204 S. W. 1074; affirmed 252 U. S. 571. State ex rel. Washington University v. Public Service Comm’n, 308 Mo. 328, 342; 272 S. W. 971; State ex rel. Public Service Comm’n v. Latshaw, 325 Mo. 909, 917-918; 30 S. W. (2d) 105; State ex rel. Kirkwood v. Public Service Comm’n, 330 Mo. 507, 52…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 62 F.2d 663 (1st Cir. 1933)
  …Bellows Falls Pulp Plaster Co. et al., 266 F. 81. In each of these cases the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit refused to sustain such a bill, and in the Munger Case a writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 252 U. S. 582, 40 S. Ct. 392, 64 L. Ed. 727. The Munger Case was a patent infringement ease, and not grounded on a breach of contract as is the present ease; but, if a bill of discovery would ever lie to obtain evidence solely on the question of damages, .we think it would lie…
• Bonnar v. The United States, 438 F.2d 540 (Ct. Cl. 1971)
  …denied, 269 U.S. 583, 46 S.Ct. 120, 70 L.Ed. 424; Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Markham, 68 F.Supp. 829, 831 (S.D.N.Y.1946); Keppelmann v. Keppelmann, 91 N.J.Eq. 67, 108 A. 432 (1919), cert. denied sub nom. Keppelmann v. Palmer, 252 U.S. 581, 40 S.Ct. 392, 64 L.Ed. 727 (1920); Cordero v. Brownell, 211 F. 2d 90 (2d Cir., 1954); and Feller v. McGrath, supra. In Keppelmann v. Palmer, supra, the court said: -» * * phe manifest purpose of Congress was that the statute should operate, not only upon proper…