ALFRED R. SWANN
v.
W. W. AUSTELL, EXECUTOR, ETC., ET AL.
ALFRED R. SWANN
W. W. AUSTELL, EXECUTOR, ETC., ET AL.
252 U.S. 579
Supreme Court of the United States (1920)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carlisle Packing Co. v. Sandanger, 259 U.S. 255 (U.S. 1922)
-
Ross v. Steamship Zeeland, 240 F.2d 820 (4th Cir. 1957)…es which are inherently sound and seaworthy absolutely free at all times from transitory unsafe conditions resulting from their use. Cookingham v. U. S., 3 Cir., 184 F. 2d 213; Hanrahan v. Pacific Transport Co., 2 Cir., 262 F. 951, certiorari denied 252 U.S. 579, 40 S.Ct. 345, 64 L.Ed. 726; Adamowski v. Gulf Oil Corp., D.C.E.D. Pa., 93 F.Supp. 115, affirmed 3 Cir., 197 F. 2d 523; Shannon v. Union Barge Line Corp:, 3 Cir., 194 F. 2d 584, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 846, 73 S.Ct. 62, 97 L.Ed. 658; Daniels v. P…
-
Sherwood Lester v. United States, 234 F.2d 625 (2d Cir. 1956)…port,5 the measure of liability remains the same as that to seamen at sea: whether the vessel was reasonably fit for the purpose for which she was being used.6 In Hanrahan v. Pacific [*629] Transport Co., 2 Cir., 1919, 262 F. 951, certiorari denied 252 U.S. 579, 40 S.Ct. 345, 64 L.Ed. 726, we held that a ship which was in port and fast to a pier was not unseaworthy as to a crewman who had fallen overboard from an upper deck because it lacked hand rails: “Seaworthiness is a relative term; a vessel may have…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence