WALTER M. REEDER ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Singer v. United States, 323 U.S. 338 (U.S. 1945)
  …es effected by the conspiracy provision of the 1940 Act. The cases had raised doubt whether § 6 of the Criminal Code was properly applicable to conspiracies to violate by force the Draft Act. Compare Reeder v. United States, 262 F. 36, cert. denied, 252 U. S. 581, with Haywood v. United States, 268 F. 795, 799, cert. denied, 256 U. S. 689. By specific inclusion of a conspiracy provision in the Selective Service Act, instead of leaving it to the generality of § 6 of the Criminal Code, the doubt was completely…
• Bonnar v. The United States, 438 F.2d 540 (Ct. Cl. 1971)
  …, 1925), cert. denied, 269 U.S. 583, 46 S.Ct. 120, 70 L.Ed. 424; Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Markham, 68 F.Supp. 829, 831 (S.D.N.Y.1946); Keppelmann v. Keppelmann, 91 N.J.Eq. 67, 108 A. 432 (1919), cert. denied sub nom. Keppelmann v. Palmer, 252 U.S. 581, 40 S.Ct. 392, 64 L.Ed. 727 (1920); Cordero v. Brownell, 211 F. 2d 90 (2d Cir., 1954); and Feller v. McGrath, supra. In Keppelmann v. Palmer, supra, the court said: -» * * phe manifest purpose of Congress was that the statute should operate, not on…