CARL GOEPEL ET AL., PARTNERS, ETC.

v.

A. MITCHELL PALMER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN

Citator

Cited By

• Cunningham v. Merchs'. Nat. Bank of Manchester, 4 F.2d 25 (1st Cir. 1925)
  …ence, was fraud within the meaning of section 67e, because the insolvent’s estate was depleted by the transfer that the transferor intended to have effect as a preference. That court rejected that contention, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. 252 U. S. 582, 40 S. Ct. 393, 64 L. Ed. 727. Parenthetically 1 obseiwe that the decision of the present case in the court below seems to go on an analogous theory. Judge Morris held that the recipients o.f; the money paid on these vouchers got only what they wer…
• Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 62 F.2d 663 (1st Cir. 1933)
  …Loose et al. v. Bellows Falls Pulp Plaster Co. et al., 266 F. 81. In each of these cases the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit refused to sustain such a bill, and in the Munger Case a writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 252 U. S. 582, 40 S. Ct. 392, 64 L. Ed. 727. The Munger Case was a patent infringement ease, and not grounded on a breach of contract as is the present ease; but, if a bill of discovery would ever lie to obtain evidence solely on the question of damages, .we thi…
• Roark v. Am. Distilling Co., 97 F.2d 297 (8th Cir. 1938)
  …Frank L. Young Co., 1 Cir., 42 F. 2d 362, 367, reversed on other grounds 283 U.S. 398, 51 S.Ct. 538, 75 L.Ed. 1140; Alaska Homestake Mining Co. v. Krampitz, 9 Cir., 276 F. 82, 87; Empire Fuel Co. v. Lyons, 6 Cir., 257 F. 890, 892, certiorari denied 252 U.S. 582, 40 S.Ct. 393, 64 L.Ed. 727; Bankers’ Surety Co. v. Town of Holly, 8 Cir., 219 F. 96, 101, 102; Anderson v. Morris & E. R. Co., 2 Cir., 216 F. 83, 87; Natural Carbon Paint Co. v. Fred Bredel Co., 7 Cir., 193 F. 897, 899.…