GREAT WESTERN SERUM COMPANY
v.
UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Great Western Serum Company sued to recover the value of anti-hog-cholera serum and related materials seized and destroyed by federal agents in 1914, claiming that a 1915 Act of Congress created an obligation to pay for the materials. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's judgment for the United States, holding that the statute did not create an implied contract to purchase the seized materials, as there was no actual purchase agreement or understanding between the parties.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court.
The Serum Company sued to recover the value of. anti-hog-cholera serum, anti-cholera virus and serum blood,seized without agreement to purchase by agents of the Bureau of Animal Industry in November, 1914, and thereafter destroyed. Judgment went for the defendant and we are asked to reverse it upon the ground that “as a conclusion of law the court should have found that the Act of Congress of March 4, 1915, created an obligation to pay for appellant’s materials, and that the facts show an implied contract to purchase and to pay for such materials.” The act provides:
“In case of an emergency arising but of the existence of foot-and-mouth disease, rinderpest, contagious pleuropneumonia, or other contagious, or infectious disease of animals, which in the opinion of the Secretary of Agriculture threatens the live-stock industry of the country, he may expend in the city of Washington or elsewhere, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $2,500,000, which sum is hereby appropriated, or so much thereof as he determines to be necessary, in the arrest and eradication of any such disease, including the payment of claims growing out of past and future purchases and destruction, in cooperation with the States, of animals affected by or exposed to, or of materials contaminated by or exposed to, any such disease, wherever found and irrespective of ownership, under like-or substantially similar circumstances, when such owner has complied with all quarantine regulations, and said sum shall be immediately available for the purposes specified.” 38 Stat. 1115. There was no purchase of the destroyed articles or agreement therefor — none is claimed — and we think it quite clear that no contractual obligation by the United States to pay for them can be implied from the act itself.
The judgment below must be
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (34 total)
-
Cleo Syrup Corp. v. Coca-Cola Co., 139 F.2d 416 (8th Cir. 1943)
-
Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 723 F.2d 1173 (5th Cir. 1984)…r ship construction nor supplying materials for that purpose is a maritime business, and this is so even though the endeavor is undertaken when the hull lies in navigable waters. Thames Towboat Company v. The Schooner Francis McDonald, 254 U.S. 242, 41 S.Ct. 65, 65 L.Ed. 245 (1920). On the other hand, ship repair has been viewed as maritime activity. North Pacific Steamship Company v. Hall Brothers Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Company, 249 U.S. 119, 39 S.Ct. 221, 63 L.Ed. 510 (1919). With respect to tort…
-
Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Perdue, 539 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1976)…upon the designations of the two waterfront unions as “cotton header’s” and “longshoremen’s” or upon the terms of their jurisdictional agreements. Compare note 24, supra. . See, e. g., Thames Towboat Co. v. The Francis McDonald, 254 U.S. 242, 243, 41 S.Ct. 65, 65 L.Ed. 245 (1920). . See, e. g., Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, 409 U.S. 249, 93 S.Ct. 493, 34 L.Ed.2d 454 (1972). . Art. Ill, Section 2 of the Constitution extends the federal judicial power “to all Cases of admiralty and m…
Previewing 3 of 34 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence