ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI

U.S. | 1921-01-17
No. 117
Me. Justice Pitney and Me. Justice Clarke dissent.
254 U.S. 535 Supreme Court of the United States (1921) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 65 L. Ed. 389 · 41 S. Ct. 192 · 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1866 · SCDB 1920-211
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court reviewed a Missouri Public Service Commission order requiring a railway company to restore two through passenger trains to their pre-1913 route serving the city of Caruthersville. The Court held the order invalid as an undue burden on interstate commerce, finding that adequate local passenger train service already existed to meet the city's reasonable transportation needs, and that rerouting the through trains would impose substantial costs and operational burdens without proportionate local benefit.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice McReynoldS'

Mr. Justice McReynoldS' delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error’s main line extends from St. Louis to Memphis — 305 miles. As originally constructed it turned sharply southeastward at Hayti, Missouri — 220 miles. from St. Louis — ran thence seven miles to Caruthersville, a city of four thousand people, thence southwestward nine miles to Grassy Bayou and thence south. A “ cut-off ” between Hayti and Grassy Bayou — six miles — became part of the main line in 1904 and thereafter through freight and night passenger trains passed that way. The through day passenger trains — Nos. 801 and 802 — continued to move along the old line until August, 1913, when they were routed over the “cut-off.” At the sáme time two new daily passenger trains were put on and operated between Blytheville, Arkansas, and Cape Girardeau, Missouri, by way of Caruthersville.

The Missouri Public Service Commission directed the Railway Company to restore trains 801 and 802 to the route followed prior to 1913 and the State Supreme Court approved this action. We are asked to declare the order invalid because it unduly burdens interstate commerce. The point is well taken.

Fourteen local daily passenger trains move in and out of Caruthersville — seven each way. Some of these make close connections with all through trains at Hayti. These locals do not carry equipment of the highest class, but apparently they afford fair facilities for reaching and leaving Caruthersville without serious delay or great inconvenience. If deficient in schedule or equipment there is an easy remedy by ¿deans other than detours of the through trains.

The applicable general doctrine has been often considered and in Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Wisconsin Railroad Commission, 237 U. S. 220, 226, this court said:

“In reviewing the decision we may start with certain principles as established: (1) It is competent for a State to require adequate local facilities, even to the stoppage of interstate trains or. the re-arrangement of their schedules. (2) Such facilities existing — that is, the local ..conditions being adequately met — the obligation of the railroad is performed, and the stoppage of interstate trains becomes an improper and illegal interference with interstate com-, merce. (3) And this, whether the interference be directly by the legislature or by its command through the orders of an administrative' body. (4) The fact of local facilities this coüH may determine, such fact being necessarily involved in the* determination of the Federal question whether an order concerning an interstate train does or does not directly regulate interstate commerce, by imposing an arbitrary requirement. Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427; Lake Share R. R. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285; Atlantic Coast Line v. Nor. Car. Corp. Comm., 206 U. S. 1; Mo. Pac. Ry. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262; Cleveland &c. Ry. v. Illinois, 177 U. S. 514; Mississippi R. R. Comm. v. Ill. Cent. R. R., 203 U. S. 335; Atlantic Coast Line v. Wharton, 207 U. S. 328.”

Considering the facts disclosed we think it plain that the fourteen local passenger trains meet the reasonable requirements of Caruthersville and that the Commission’s order unduly burdens interstate commerce. Compliance with it would require the Railway to maintain sixteen more miles of track at the high standard essential for the through trains, and to move the latter ten miles further with consequent delay and inconveniences all along the line. The burden certainly would not be less serious than those which were condemned in some if not all of the causes above referred to.

The judgment of the court below must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed.

Mr. Justice Pitney and Mr. Justice Clarke dissent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • S. Pac. Co. v. Arizona Ex rel. Sullivan, 325 U.S. 761 (U.S. 1945)
    …ardens, supra; Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 233 U. S. 75, 79; South Covington R. Co. v. Covington, 235 U. S. 537, 546; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Texas, 245 U. S. 484, 488; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 254 U. S. 535, 537; Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel, 278 U. S. 1, 10; Gwin, White & Prince v. Henneford, 305 U. S. 434, 441; McCarroll v, Dixie Lines, 309 U. S. 176. Congress has undoubted power to redefine the distribution of power over interstate commerc…
  • Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant, 257 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1921)
    …. Co. v. State Public Utilities Commission, 249 U. S. 422; Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. Ochs, 249 U. S. 416; Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 250 U. S. 566, and St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 254 U. S. 535. Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright, 249 U. S. 275; Corn Products Refining Co. v. Eddy, 249 U. S. 427; Chalker v. Birmingham & Northwestern Ry. Co., 249 U. S. 522; New Orleans & Northeastern R. R. Co. v. Scarlet, 249 U. S. 528; Yazoo & Mississippi Valle…
  • …Co., 203 U. S. 335; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Wharton, 207 U. S. 328; Herndon v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 218 U. S. 135; Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 237 U. S. 220; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 254 U. S. 535. Cf. Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427; Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Lawrence, 173 U. S. 285; Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Texas, 246 U. S. 58, where statutes requiring local service no greater than necessary for fair accommodation of l…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw