DAVID LAMAR ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1920-12-13
No. 140
254 U.S. 616 Supreme Court of the United States (1920) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court

Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted December 6, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920, Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288. And see Boise Water Co. v. Boise City, 230 U. S. 98, 100; Chott v. Ewing, 237 U. S. 197; Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U. S. 53, 60-61. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline for r laintiffs in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. Henry S. Mitchell for the United States.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Meyer, 140 F.2d 652 (2d Cir. 1944)
    …v. United States, 9 Cir., 119 F. 2d 140; 18 U.S.C.A. § 556. And, the indictment being thus sufficient, there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s request for a bill of particulars. Horowitz v. United States, 2 Cir., 262 F. 48, dismissed 254 U.S. 616, 41 S.Ct. 148, 65 L.Ed. 440. Refusal of the court to charge the jury that defendant must have been given an opportunity to correct his testimony if he so chose was justified by United States v. Norris, 300 U.S. 564, 57 S.Ct. 535, 81 L.Ed. 808, wher…
  • Fabacher v. United States, 84 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1936)
    …he crimes were committed. Rosen v. United States, 161 U.S. 29, 16 S.Ct. 434, 40 L.Ed. 606; Savage v. United States (C.C.A.) 270 F. 14; Moens v. United States, 50 App.D.C. 15, 267 F. 317; Horowitz v. United States (C.C.A.) 262 F. 48, appeal dismissed 254 U.S. 616, 41 S.Ct. 148, 65 L.Ed. 440; Mayer v. United States (C.C.A.) 259 F. 216; Collins v. United States (C.C.A.) 253 F. 609; Knauer v. United States (C.C.A.) 237 F. 8. The testimony of the witness Heb-son with reference to the contract of sale over the l…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw