MAGGIE HARJO
v.
W. A. KUNKLE ET AL.
MAGGIE HARJO
W. A. KUNKLE ET AL.
254 U.S. 620
Supreme Court of the United States (1921)
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1905)
- Sugarman v. United States, 249 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1919)
- Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1920)
- Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71 (U.S. 1909)
- Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U.S. 580 (U.S. 1915)
- Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1907)
- United Sur. Co. v. Am. Fruit Prod. Co., 238 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1915)
- Berkman v. United States, 250 U.S. 114 (U.S. 1919)