GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

U.S. | 1921-01-24
No. 163
254 U.S. 620 Supreme Court of the United States (1921) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, §2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. E. C. Bindley, with whom Mr. M. L. Countryman was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Richard S. Wiggin, with whom Mr. Charles D. Gould was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Pub. Motor Serv., Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J., 99 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir. 1938)
    …pect of the amount due from Motor Service, and thus have limited their liability to that amount. Ivinson v. Hutton, 1878, 98 U.S. 79, 25 L.Ed. 66; Barnett v. Kunkle, 8 Cir., 1919, 256 F. 644, dismissed for want of jurisdiction Harjo v. Kunkle, 1921, 254 U.S. 620, 41 S.Ct. 319, 65 L.Ed. 442. Affirmed. Tlie face of the note was $18,906.79. Interest was at 6%. There were admitted payments amounting to $588.72. The appellee had credited a further sum of $113.18 “in settlement of overcharges.” According to the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw