JOHN GOOCH, JR.
v.
OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY

U.S. | 1920-10-11
No. 412
254 U.S. 623 Supreme Court of the United States (1920) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gooch v. Or. Short Line R.R. Co., 258 U.S. 22 (U.S. 1922)
    …ant, but ^was riot disabled from giving the notice. ’ He failed to give it, however. The District Court directed a.non-suit and its.judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 264 Fed. 664. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 254 U. S. 623. [*24] *The only question is whether the requirement of notice in writing was valid. The railroad company does not contend that it could have exonerated itself altogether from liability for negligence, Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. v. Chatman, 244 U.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw