THOMAS WELSH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …ision of this court as assertedly “recognizing that where the evidence as to both defendants is exactly the same, inconsistent verdicts will not be allowed to stand.” See American Socialist Soc’y v. United States, 266 F. 212 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 254 U.S. 637, 41 S.Ct. 12, 65 L.Ed. 451 (1920). In the first place, the extent to which American Socialist Soc’y “recognizes” [*655] such a rule is not at all clear. The court’s opinion included a sentence to that effect,6 but the ruling was that the verdicts w…
• Am. Med. Ass'n v. United States (D.D.C. 1942)
  …. 41, 80 L.Ed. 121; United States v. Anderson, 7 Cir., 101 F. 2d 325, 332, 333, certiorari denied 307 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 822, 83 L.Ed. 1502; Thornton, Combinations in Restraint of Trade (1928) §§ 211, 454. 2 Cir., 266 P. 212, 214, certiorari denied 254 U.S. 637, 41 S.Ct. 12, 65 L.Ed. 451. United States v. Union Supply Co., 215 U.S. 50, 30 S.Ct. 15, 54 L.Ed. 87. United States v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 121 F. 2d 376, 411, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 618, 62 S.Ct. 105, 86 L.Ed. -; United States v. Aus…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Vahlco Corp., 720 F.2d 885 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …sions, to grant directed verdicts for the plaintiff at the close of defendant’s opening statement, see Gundersheimer’s, Inc. v. Bakery, etc., Union, 119 F. 2d 205 (D.C.Cir. 1941); Houk Mfs. Co. v. Cowen Co., 467 Fed. 787 (2d Cir.1920), cert. denied, 254 U.S. 637, 41 S.Ct. 9, 65 L.Ed. 450 (1920); Franklin v. Matoa Gold Min. Co., 158 Fed. 941 (8th Cir.1907). See also Gonzalez, 601 F. 2d at 609 n. 4 (“A directed verdict might be proper at the close of plaintiff’s case if defendant rests without putting in evid…