CHARLEY TOY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1970)
  …n to persons found in possession of opium, morphine, or heroin include Gee Woe v. United States, 250 F. 428 (C. A. 5th Cir.), cert. denied, 248 U. S. 562 (1918) (smoking opium); Charley Toy v. United States, 266 F. 326 (C. A. 2d Cir.), cert. denied, 254 U. S. 639 (1920) (smoking opium); Copperthwaite v. United States, 37 F. 2d 846 (C. A. 6th Cir. 1930) (morphine); United States v. Liss, 105 F. 2d 144 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1939) (morphine); Dear Check Quong v. United States, 82 U. S. App. D. C. 8, 160 F. 2d 251 (1…
• Blisscraft OF Hollywood v. United Plastics Co., 294 F.2d 694 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …coined or fanciful mark. A technical trademark, consisting of a coined or fanciful expression, comes into being as soon as it is affixed to the goods and the goods are sold. Wallace & Co. v. Repetti, 2 Cir., 1920, 266 F. 307, 308, certiorari denied 254 U.S. 639, 41 S.Ct. 13, 65 L.Ed. 451;3 1 Nims, Unfair Competition & Trademarks § 218 at 633 (4th Ed. 1947); Restatement, Torts § 716, comment a (1938). Priority of user alone is controlling. See United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co., 1918, 248 U.S. 90, 100…
• Shurman v. United States, 219 F.2d 282 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …n v. United States, 58 App.D.C. 255, 29 F. 2d 455; Goode v. United States, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 67, 149 F. 2d 377; Frazier v. United States, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 332, 163 F. 2d 817. See also Charley Toy v. United States,,2 Cir., 266 F. 326, certi-orari denied 254 U.S. 639, 41 S.Ct. 13, 65 L.Ed. 452. In this Circuit, then, this proposition is so firmly established as to be beyond dispute. B. We agree with the defendants, however, that here the presumption was rebutted by the evidence;8 and since there was no evidenc…