DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS
v.
MRS. B. M. MOORE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS
MRS. B. M. MOORE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.
254 U.S. 640
Supreme Court of the United States (1920)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sumney v. S. RY. Co., 89 F.2d 437 (4th Cir. 1937)…a car is shifted or a train moved on its switching yards, for the reason stated by Justice Brewer in Aerkfetz v. Humphreys, 145 U.S. 418, 12 S.Ct. 835, 36 L.Ed. 758.” The cases of Moore v. Director General,. 179 N.C. 637, 103 S.E. 444, cert, denied 254 U.S. 640, 41 S.Ct. 13, 65 L. Ed. 452, and Thayer v. Hines, 145 Minn. 240, 176 N.W. 752, called to our attention by appellant, are not in point. In the first of these cases, the injury of decedent resulted from a flying switch, which was made in violation of…